Skip to main content

Reading 1-1 Everton

What is there to say about Reading women that hasn't already been said? Reading registered their sixth 1-1 draw of the season.

What was new was that this was the first Reading game where they bettered their opponent's xG by over a goal, outside of games against the bottom four. Not only that, but they've exceeded the opposition's xG in each of the last three matches, before that they'd failed to do so in consecutive matches. While Villa are one of those sides, Manchester United and Everton are legitimately good teams this year.

Unfortunately, Reading didn't manage to convert chances - but, as the xG stats suggest, this wasn't the same sort of performance as clinging on in the reverse fixture. They had a number of chances to score more in the first half but didn't convert. 

Eikeland needs to bend the ball into the far post, but her shot is at the goalkeeper    

Amalie Eikeland had a chance within the first ten minutes to bend past the goalkeeper coming in from the corner of the box but didn't set it far enough out of the keeper's reach. Rowe hesitates for a second to try to understand where the ball is going but had she just continued her run she probably would have had a tap in. Then the Norwegian had an opportunity from a free-kick at the back post - where Reading have been consistently deadly throughout the season - but hit the upright before Harding's follow up header was cleared off the line.

While Reading's press is fairly disorganised at times, it almost paid off toward the end of the first half. The Royals forced Everton back to their keeper, and a poor touch from their centre back allowed James to steal the ball and feed Rowe on the right side of the box. Harding ran toward the front post, and tried to shoot first time but only managed to deflect the ball out of Eikeland's path coming in behind her.

Reading's goal came about by a slice of good fortune. A good cross from Lily Woodham saw the Everton defender attempt to head the ball clear. Instead, she headed against Carter and the ball looped over the keeper for Rowe to finish. A slice of good fortune, but arguably deserved. 

There are still some questions around whether playing long is the right plan A for this side. They have excellent passers of the football in the defensive unit. In Carter, they have someone willing and able to play between the lines and receive passes. She's in the 84th percentile of progressive passes received among forwards (as per fbref) and rivals Fishlock in shot-creating actions when she plays. Rather than having her play as a front two, why not drop her into central attacking midfield and form a 4-2-3-1? That also allows the current attacking midfielders to focus on protecting the wide areas, which was ultimately the downfall here.

Eikeland pressing narrow means Everton have too much space down the wing. To compound the issue, nobody picks up Sorensen coming in from the other side.

As the game developed, Everton started pushing their full backs higher, getting their three forwards - and midfield runners - into the box. Reading aren't set up to defend the wide areas, and it's easy for opposition teams to overwhelm the full back. The Toffees did precisely that as they drew level. Ingrid Moe Wold running completely untracked down the right and clipping to the back post for Sorensen to nod back past Moloney.

Yet another goal conceded in the final fifteen minutes - made worse by the fact that Reading haven't scored at home after the 56th minute all season. The home side only named six substitutes, and Chambers brought on the only outfield players over 18 in Leine and Bruton - both of whom are also coming back from injuries. Conversely, the away side managed to introduce four attacking internationals. Reading's squad just can't compete with that currently.

It's probably not helped by the main angle of attack being balls over the top for the front four to chase. I've touched on how much work Fishlock is expected to do, but that's just as true for Eikeland and Rowe. You don't see those two stop shuttling back and forth but, again, that surely costs the team toward the end of the game. Perhaps it's time to look at a less intense way of playing?

At the end of the day, as much as Reading players may have been talking this up as a six-pointer, it's a decent point against a side above us. Next time out we have to right a wrong from earlier in the season, when we failed to beat Bristol City despite battering them for 90 minutes. More importantly, another opportunity for Reading to realise they need to sign Ebony Salmon.


Popular posts from this blog

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

The Big Man Cometh

In the grand scheme of things, I consider myself a bit of an Andy Carroll sceptic. Reading have a penchant for signing players that spend the majority of their time in the physio room, and Carroll aligns with that transfer policy to a tee. It must be said that given the lack of other options, and a short term deal that has no real risk for the club, there isn't any big downside in gambling on the Geordie. With that being said, even I was calling out for the introduction for The Big Man at half-time on Saturday. Reading had a heap of possession just outside the box in the opening forty-five but couldn't translate that into chances. Drinkwater had a tame shot saved after good work from Yiadom, but the best chance of the half fell to Puscas after a fortuitous deflection off a Forest player. The flag went up for offside but it didn't matter as the striker couldn't convert anyway. Both managers had done a fairly good job at negating the other side's strengths. Forest'

"We’ve never been so flat"

There have been some abysmal Reading performances this season, I don't really need to list them out. But in that dirge, there are two performances that I haven't fully come to terms with my feelings on. The visits of Sheffield United and Luton to The SCL are a clash between feeling like the concept behind the tactics was  reasonable and the implementation clearly not working. But there's one issue with my reading of the game; Veljko himself wasn't happy with either performance. In fact, he used the exact same word to label both - 'flat'. Reading's three in midfield meant they could cover SU attacking midfielders and wing backs And yet, the set-ups for both seem to perfectly explain why the team may be flat. Against The Blades they switched to a 4-3-2-1, with Ejaria dropping deeper to form the three alongside Drinkwater and Laurent. That trio were effectively tasked with stopping McGoldrick and Gibbs-White from being able to come central. On Wednesday we may