Skip to main content

Reading 1-2 Manchester United

In a complete reversal to last weekend Reading were up against the side top of the table, rather than the bottom. While giving a good account of themselves, they'll be unhappy in the manner of defeat.

Nothing sums up the problem inherent in a 4-2-2-2 quite like the Red Devils using their width to put themselves in 2-on-1 situations in wide areas with dangerous runners in behind. The six players in front of the defence are all focused on the centre of the pitch, allowing time and space wide. The attacking midfield duo are meant to put pressure on opposition fullbacks, but that's slightly easier for 25yo Eikeland on the right than 36yo Williams out left.

Another issue is that, given that Reading are always reticent about using their fullbacks in attacking situations lest they be caught out like on United's opening goal, there are often few options when attacking that don't require a skilful pass. That's exacerbated on the break when James and Fishlock aren't legitimate options. Too often it ends up leading to players running down dead ends. And it's frustrating because when Reading utilise the wider areas themselves they often create good opportunities.

United's opener was easily avoidable, right from Harries decision to go down in the United box under little pressure. From there the away side regained the ball and were able to set Galton away down the left. Neither Fishlock nor Leine were able to keep up, with the latter moving a little hesitantly after a tackle. As Cooper came across to cover, Galton shifted the ball left and fired almost straight were Moloney should have been positioned - except she'd preemptively gone to her left expecting the shot across her.

Too often Reading took the wrong options in the final third of the pitch. Emma Harries, making her first start, had a decent game, but showed her lack of experience on a few occasions. For instance, after Reading won the ball back high on the right, she opted to attempt to beat the United player rather than just whipping a ball across for Harding to attack.

So it was lucky that United helped them out. Harding chased a ball into the left channel - one of the only times that Reading attempted to set Harding away and recycled possession with Fishlock. The Welsh international played into Fara Williams, who shielded the ball from three United players. One of them got a boot in to direct the ball back into Fishlock's path, and her shot was deflected past Earps in goal. Much like the men's team midweek, hardly a replicable attack but one that saw the scores level.

The game was poised to be Reading's fifth straight 1-1 draw, but their downfall was the corners that, up until the 83rd minute, they'd defended so well. The Royals were consistently first to the incoming ball, but this time the header ricocheted off a couple of players and ended up being perfect for Hayley Ladd - totally free - to nod in from close range. Fishlock, not for the first time this season, was caught ball watching and didn't track the run, making it a far easier header than it should have been.

So, a disappointing loss if not unexpected. Going into a game against lowly Brighton, Reading are becoming cut adrift from the teams above them. Four points the gap to Everton, with another four to the top four. Meanwhile, the gap down to eleventh is a measly, you may have guessed it, four points. To give this season any meaning at all they need to kick into gear quickly.


Popular posts from this blog

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

The Big Man Cometh

In the grand scheme of things, I consider myself a bit of an Andy Carroll sceptic. Reading have a penchant for signing players that spend the majority of their time in the physio room, and Carroll aligns with that transfer policy to a tee. It must be said that given the lack of other options, and a short term deal that has no real risk for the club, there isn't any big downside in gambling on the Geordie. With that being said, even I was calling out for the introduction for The Big Man at half-time on Saturday. Reading had a heap of possession just outside the box in the opening forty-five but couldn't translate that into chances. Drinkwater had a tame shot saved after good work from Yiadom, but the best chance of the half fell to Puscas after a fortuitous deflection off a Forest player. The flag went up for offside but it didn't matter as the striker couldn't convert anyway. Both managers had done a fairly good job at negating the other side's strengths. Forest'

"We’ve never been so flat"

There have been some abysmal Reading performances this season, I don't really need to list them out. But in that dirge, there are two performances that I haven't fully come to terms with my feelings on. The visits of Sheffield United and Luton to The SCL are a clash between feeling like the concept behind the tactics was  reasonable and the implementation clearly not working. But there's one issue with my reading of the game; Veljko himself wasn't happy with either performance. In fact, he used the exact same word to label both - 'flat'. Reading's three in midfield meant they could cover SU attacking midfielders and wing backs And yet, the set-ups for both seem to perfectly explain why the team may be flat. Against The Blades they switched to a 4-3-2-1, with Ejaria dropping deeper to form the three alongside Drinkwater and Laurent. That trio were effectively tasked with stopping McGoldrick and Gibbs-White from being able to come central. On Wednesday we may