Skip to main content

Reading 0-0 Huddersfield Town

Back down to Earth with a bump. It's one thing to draw a match, it's another to feel like you don't necessarily deserve to. Thankfully, Huddersfield didn't really do enough to win so I guess it evens itself out.

Blackett wants to make the blue run, expects Obita to cut inside. Obita runs wide and Blackett takes himself out of play by running into the same space

Obviously, Bowen made a curious team selection - which is amazing when only changing one player. Playing Jordan Obita completely changes the dynamic of the left-hand side. He hugs wide to the touchline and looks to cross. Of the five he attempted, he completed just one. Meite may be a good aerial threat on the right, against smaller full-backs, but centre backs tend to have a couple of inches on him. Ejaria, meanwhile, came inside and allowed Blackett to give the width. There were a few times when Blackett just didn't know whether to make the outside or inside run and ended up doing nothing.

So, if Obita was the wrong choice who was the correct one? Well, potentially Michael Olise. Although he does seem more comfortable coming inside onto his stronger foot from the right. So maybe starting Lucas Boyé wouldn't have been such a bad idea. I'm still firmly in the 'don't sign him permanently' camp, but given we have nothing to play for, why not give the Argentine a run-out? He's had a tough time here and probably deserves a little reward.

Pelé rolls the ball into Puscas. The forward holds off two challenges but has no real support and ends up going backwards. Pelé could have offered for the ball back down the line.

And when the left side doesn't fire it's difficult to direct too much criticism at Meite or Puscas. This is a problem that goes back to Millwall in January. On that day at The Den Millwall stopped us playing down the left, and the game plan disintegrated. Midweek it was our team selection that achieved the same result. And, in fact, neither were that bad. I thought Puscas played pretty well, but it's not his fault he's got no support. Think he was unlucky to get subbed rather than a straight Meite/Olise swap, but heaven forbid we play without Yakou.

I've done this to death by now so won't bore you any more with it other than this is a manager who keeps harping on about how high up we're attempting to finish in the table, but we're playing 4-1-4-1 (and a true 4-1-4-1, with two flat banks of four) at home to Huddersfield with less than 40% possession. I cannot imagine that when fans do come back they'll be too happy with that sort of football.

Highlighting the good - Pelé commits Mounié and ESR before shifting the ball to Morrison.

Pelé, who had been singled out for praise on BBCRB, wasn't actually that good. He was dribbled past four times, more than any other game this season. Part of that is because Emile Smith Rowe is really good, and that's completely understandable, but he's on the pitch to negate the player between the lines and he didn't do that. On the whole, he was better in possession. He has a tendency to take one touch and then either attempt a pass or drive into space. He's good at committing a player and then shifting the ball; the problem is that too often his more progressive balls on the counter tend to fail and put pressure straight back on the team.

Blackett tries to get to the ball before Lossl. Admittedly Blackett doesn't feel like the usual target, so maybe this was meant back post? Maybe we were trying to find Meite at the front post? I have no idea. Willock left Pelé late, but look how much space he's in. A lot. A lot of space.

The corner routine was interesting (or, I guess you could say, bad). Reading had four. We ran slightly different routines each time, but the ball in was the same - each giving Lossl catching practice. I think the third (not pictured because that would be too easy) gave the best idea of what Reading were trying to do - stealing in front of Lossl before he could get there, but all were overhit and I may be being generous with my interpretation. Huddersfield did pretty well at allowing the keeper to come to meet the ball by holding off Reading players, and they set up decent counters too. So for the fourth Reading mixed it up, by working a horrendous short corner routine that led to John Swift under hitting a backpass and almost allowing Huddersfield in to score. So maybe just stick with plan A.

Personally, and I know this will be coming across, I hate this football. It is depressing, defensive play. It's not even particularly effective. Let's put this in perspective - Huddersfield played Luton after this match and lost 2-0. We had two shots on target in ninety minutes - and one of those was a speculative hit with the last kick of the game. We'll probably hammer Charlton now, but as we've already seen, that doesn't really mean much.


Popular posts from this blog

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

The Big Man Cometh

In the grand scheme of things, I consider myself a bit of an Andy Carroll sceptic. Reading have a penchant for signing players that spend the majority of their time in the physio room, and Carroll aligns with that transfer policy to a tee. It must be said that given the lack of other options, and a short term deal that has no real risk for the club, there isn't any big downside in gambling on the Geordie. With that being said, even I was calling out for the introduction for The Big Man at half-time on Saturday. Reading had a heap of possession just outside the box in the opening forty-five but couldn't translate that into chances. Drinkwater had a tame shot saved after good work from Yiadom, but the best chance of the half fell to Puscas after a fortuitous deflection off a Forest player. The flag went up for offside but it didn't matter as the striker couldn't convert anyway. Both managers had done a fairly good job at negating the other side's strengths. Forest'

"We’ve never been so flat"

There have been some abysmal Reading performances this season, I don't really need to list them out. But in that dirge, there are two performances that I haven't fully come to terms with my feelings on. The visits of Sheffield United and Luton to The SCL are a clash between feeling like the concept behind the tactics was  reasonable and the implementation clearly not working. But there's one issue with my reading of the game; Veljko himself wasn't happy with either performance. In fact, he used the exact same word to label both - 'flat'. Reading's three in midfield meant they could cover SU attacking midfielders and wing backs And yet, the set-ups for both seem to perfectly explain why the team may be flat. Against The Blades they switched to a 4-3-2-1, with Ejaria dropping deeper to form the three alongside Drinkwater and Laurent. That trio were effectively tasked with stopping McGoldrick and Gibbs-White from being able to come central. On Wednesday we may