Skip to main content

Scout Report: Stoke City

Still no football, but in a concerted effort to keep myself sane, I'll be reviewing our final nine opponents just in case the season ever does restart. Which is more than unlikely, especially with teams in the form portrayed here.

At the turn of the year, Stoke changed from a 4-3-3 (4-1-2-3) to a 4-2-3-1. Jordan Cousins, who had been the holding player throughout December, lost favour to Nick Powell playing behind the striker. Clucas and Allen in midfield dropped a little deeper, although they're still involved offensively. Up top Tyrese Campbell has forced his way into the side over the likes of more old fashioned figures of Sam Vokes and Lee Gregory.

There's been a lot of change at the back. Stephen Ward's injury meant Bruno Martins Indi moved out to the left, and James Chester's arrival on loan from Aston Villa meant there's no space for Liam Lindsay.

There are clearly areas of improvement defensively for a team who have shipped four goals on two occasions this year alone.

Butland has not had a good season. The man between the sticks seems to panic when the ball when there are men around him, and his decision making has been poor. Even routine saves are not necessarily straightforward. Given that he was named the club's player of the season last year it's obvious there's still a good keeper there; maybe some time away from the game is exactly what he needs.

Batth has been the one constant among centre back pairings. He likes to step out from the defensive line and put pressure on attackers in front of him. That can lead to him getting caught out, but he's the master of the tactical foul. He's 6th on the list of most fouls given away by CBs (min 10 apps). The main weakness centrally seems to be one of a lack of agility and acceleration. All of Stoke's options lack a yard of pace to make up for mistakes. Crucially, if a centre back steps out but doesn't win the ball, they have no hope of recovering.

Brunos Martin Indi makes the tackle, but there were players over if Dack had got the pass away.

The fullbacks defend narrow, often relying on the wingers to get back and close down players in wide positions. They can get too narrow at times; dragged to the centre of the pitch with players overloading outside them. Ince, McClean, and Powell are not the most diligent of defenders, so can find themselves out of position, but their effort often can't be faulted.

Against Preston, it was a pair of corners that were The Potters downfall. And, although they managed to turn it round in stoppage time, the same issue arose against Sheffield Wednesday. Away at Huddersfield they won 5-2 but conceded from a corner and a free-kick.

If you look at the stats, Stoke actually rank among the better teams at defending from set-pieces, and there are mitigating circumstances for their poor games. Wednesday was Shawcross' first full game since an injury pre-season, Huddersfield saw Linday back in the team after sitting out for a couple, and Chester started his first match in the defeat to Preston. Perhaps it was just a case of misunderstanding roles.

Just after a corner, Stoke leave Eze and Samuel one-on-one with Martins Indi and Batth. Allen's shot is blocked, and Eze draws a good save at the other end on the counter.

The midfield duo of Clucas and Allen are surprisingly forwarded-minded, given the roles they occupy. That can lead to getting caught on the counter, as QPR showed to great effect. That's not to say they do no defensive work. Allen is an absolute nuisance to players with the ball. The one thing Stoke seem intent not to give opposition players is time on the ball.

When Powell plays at 10, he drifts mercurially around the pitch, helping on either wing in the build-up, before getting himself into the box. He was moved to the left after McClean's injury, but the only thing that really changed is his starting position. He still looks to score when the ball is on the right, and he's not looking to get to the byline in the same way McClean does. Powell is one of the big successes of O'Neill's tenure so far, alongside Campbell.

James McClean was actually the main creative output when on the pitch when fit. His role is almost simply just to beat his man and cross into the box. Clucas acts as the support player, often underlapping the Irishman, as Martins Indi doesn't tend to go forward - although he does offer the ability to cross from deep should it be needed. On the other side Ince, or occasionally Campbell, cuts inside onto his stronger left foot. That gives Smith the opportunity to overlap, and he's picked up a pair of assists in his last two matches.

Powell notices that Morrison isn't switched on to the danger around him, and forces a bad touch with the press.

The focus is on progressing the ball quickly to the final third. There's a clear target with Vokes up top. Powell runs beyond him, and the midfield duo look for knockdowns. With Campbell, it's more about working the ball into the channels, or over the top of the opposition defence. Allen and Clucas are bypassed a lot of the time in favour of getting the ball forward. Whether Stoke keep possession is almost of secondary importance, because if not the press often causes errors in opposition defences. Allen and Powell are particularly astute at punishing poor touches, or lapses of concentration.

Pearce is busy worrying about Ince, and doesn't see Powell behind him until it's too late. He ends up turning it home inside the six yard box, level with the near post.

Stoke are clinical with low balls into the box. Powell often gets beyond Campbell and makes a run to the near post which opens space toward the penalty spot if the run is picked up, or allows him to finish himself if not. If it does get worked to Campbell he has a seemingly natural ability to finish; combined with his strength and speed he's a real handful.

So to try to sum up Stoke's style:

  • Defend Narrow
  • Press throughout the pitch
  • Get ball forward quickly into the channel, or over the top of the defence
  • RW cuts inside onto stronger foot, RB overlaps
  • A high number of low crosses into the box, with near post runners and a man on the penalty spot
  • The midfield duo support attacks from the edge of the box and use technical ability to recycle possession
  • Dangerous on counter-attack
  • Campbell is an excellent finisher
  • Press causes mistakes
  • Keeper in poor form
  • Centre backs lack pace
  • Full backs can become too narrow, leaving space to attack


Popular posts from this blog

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

The Big Man Cometh

In the grand scheme of things, I consider myself a bit of an Andy Carroll sceptic. Reading have a penchant for signing players that spend the majority of their time in the physio room, and Carroll aligns with that transfer policy to a tee. It must be said that given the lack of other options, and a short term deal that has no real risk for the club, there isn't any big downside in gambling on the Geordie. With that being said, even I was calling out for the introduction for The Big Man at half-time on Saturday. Reading had a heap of possession just outside the box in the opening forty-five but couldn't translate that into chances. Drinkwater had a tame shot saved after good work from Yiadom, but the best chance of the half fell to Puscas after a fortuitous deflection off a Forest player. The flag went up for offside but it didn't matter as the striker couldn't convert anyway. Both managers had done a fairly good job at negating the other side's strengths. Forest'

"We’ve never been so flat"

There have been some abysmal Reading performances this season, I don't really need to list them out. But in that dirge, there are two performances that I haven't fully come to terms with my feelings on. The visits of Sheffield United and Luton to The SCL are a clash between feeling like the concept behind the tactics was  reasonable and the implementation clearly not working. But there's one issue with my reading of the game; Veljko himself wasn't happy with either performance. In fact, he used the exact same word to label both - 'flat'. Reading's three in midfield meant they could cover SU attacking midfielders and wing backs And yet, the set-ups for both seem to perfectly explain why the team may be flat. Against The Blades they switched to a 4-3-2-1, with Ejaria dropping deeper to form the three alongside Drinkwater and Laurent. That trio were effectively tasked with stopping McGoldrick and Gibbs-White from being able to come central. On Wednesday we may