Skip to main content

Nick Blackman

I don't think I've ever been as heartbroken about a player leaving as Nick Blackman. Sure, we've sold key players before - Gylfi, Shane, Kevin to name but three - but those players have, on the whole, moved out of the division and progressed their careers rather than go to serial-bottlers Derby. To make things worse, Blackman will make his league debut for Derby against us assuming he plays.

Perhaps my disappointment stems from the fact that I can, rather smugly, say "I was right." Almost nobody had faith after his, admittedly poor, first couple of seasons but I stayed resolute. I am firmly of the opinion that, had he been managed better, he would have shown this sort of form far earlier in his Reading career.

You should see a couple of the replies to that particular tweet back in June. Still, Reading have so far scored 30 times in the Championship this season, and Blackman has been involved in almost forty-five percent of those. It's no coincidence that, while he was going through a barren spell Reading have been underperforming as a whole.

The reason for his dip in form can partially be attributed to teams starting to understand they need to keep him on his right foot; eleven of his thirteen goals have been scored with his left, while the other two can be attributed to headers. Equally he had much more success in a 4-3-3, rather than a 4-2-3-1. The latter pushed him further out wide, where his lack of a right foot - combined with the tighter marking - sucked all the life out of our key player.

£3m is obviously a terrific amount to get for a player out of contract in the summer, and from a solely business decision it's perfectly understandable, but there's the sense that this is 'classic Reading'; selling our best player instead of building for the future. One of Nick's first comments on arriving at Derby was that "everything is geared up for the Premier League", it's hard to have that same feeling with our own team - even with the considerable investment over the summer.

It would be difficult to blame him for wanting to leave; Royals fans have hardly endeared themselves, and it's not as if the team has set the world alight. Even this season after a quite miserable 3-1 defeat away to Nottingham Forest, for which he was at fault for none of the goals, fans were having a go at him personally, while he was the only player to come all the way over to the fans rather than a half-hearted clap from the centre circle. Yes, sometimes he's too selfish, and sometimes he's dispossessed too easily, and his attitude appears from the outside to be poor, but he's still the club's top goalscorer this season and he didn't deserve the flak that was given to him.

He may not have played at his best in his first two years, but when you consider that he's already played more minutes this year than in either of the entire previous two seasons it's clear that it was difficult for him to find any rhythm. He's also seen far more of the ball this year when he has played; allowing him to run more, shoot more, score more. 

Losing him may not be the end of the world - McCleary is a perfect replacement on the right wing, and we have plenty of talent up front. So much of Reading's success in the past decade has been built around teamwork, and hopefully McDermott can find a way to make the team gel as effectively as it was at the beginning of the season.

Thanks for everything, Nick. Please don't score too many on the 12th.


Popular posts from this blog

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

The Big Man Cometh

In the grand scheme of things, I consider myself a bit of an Andy Carroll sceptic. Reading have a penchant for signing players that spend the majority of their time in the physio room, and Carroll aligns with that transfer policy to a tee. It must be said that given the lack of other options, and a short term deal that has no real risk for the club, there isn't any big downside in gambling on the Geordie. With that being said, even I was calling out for the introduction for The Big Man at half-time on Saturday. Reading had a heap of possession just outside the box in the opening forty-five but couldn't translate that into chances. Drinkwater had a tame shot saved after good work from Yiadom, but the best chance of the half fell to Puscas after a fortuitous deflection off a Forest player. The flag went up for offside but it didn't matter as the striker couldn't convert anyway. Both managers had done a fairly good job at negating the other side's strengths. Forest'

"We’ve never been so flat"

There have been some abysmal Reading performances this season, I don't really need to list them out. But in that dirge, there are two performances that I haven't fully come to terms with my feelings on. The visits of Sheffield United and Luton to The SCL are a clash between feeling like the concept behind the tactics was  reasonable and the implementation clearly not working. But there's one issue with my reading of the game; Veljko himself wasn't happy with either performance. In fact, he used the exact same word to label both - 'flat'. Reading's three in midfield meant they could cover SU attacking midfielders and wing backs And yet, the set-ups for both seem to perfectly explain why the team may be flat. Against The Blades they switched to a 4-3-2-1, with Ejaria dropping deeper to form the three alongside Drinkwater and Laurent. That trio were effectively tasked with stopping McGoldrick and Gibbs-White from being able to come central. On Wednesday we may