Skip to main content

Adam Le Fondre: The Right Move?

Adam Le Fondre notching 39 goals in 104 league appearances doesn't tell the whole story of a player who's scored more goals from then bench than any other player in a Premier League season. So often left out of the starting XI, but still finished the club's top scorer in all of his three seasons here.

ALF seems to have always been disenchanted with his role at the club, seeing himself as more than a 'super sub', and the statistics would somewhat agree with him. Of the 27 games he started this season we won 13, or 48%. When not in the team that figure drops to 6 from 21, or 29%. Admittedly he was on the bench for the tough December run, and in matches away at Burnley, and Wigan, which may slightly skew this in his favour.

For a team who were 16th in terms of goals from open play, and 20th in shots per game a clinical goalscorer is key. Le Fondre had the second best conversion rate, behind Hernandez, in the Premier League last season scoring on 22% of his shots. Unfortunately for Le Fondre he's only been able to muster 1.4 shots per game in the Championship. Some quick maths tells us that means he's had around 53 shots this year, which equates to a 28% conversion rate. Of course, if you take away his 6 goals in two games then you're left with 9 goals over the rest of the season, and penalties dwindle that number further - although unlike Billy Sharp he did tend to convert.

A key criticism of ALF is that he doesn't contribute enough to the team when he's not scoring, and of all our offensive options he's the one who had created the least number of chances. After his back-to-back home hat-tricks he went thirteen games without scoring, and during this time he often looked anonymous. Partly down to the football we were playing, but if we are going to play this style of football then it suits somebody with presence, HRK and Pog, far more than it does ALF. On the other hand, if we don't have a finisher on the pitch, where are the goals going to come from? Pog got a handful, but his conversion rate of around 18% is far less clinical than Le Fondre.

Obviously the fans love him, for what he's done for the club, and a sale like this has the potential to disillusion a lot of people. Thankfully, if it does go through - and it sounds like it has - then we have the whole summer to replace him, hopefully with the funds becoming available from the takeover. I just wonder whether, for the reported £1m, it's sensible to let such a player go. I'd much rather have sold McCarthy, where we have good, proven back-up in Federici but obviously nobody knows whether that was even an option with the pressing HMRC deadline.

To many people his attitude towards the club means that he won't be particularly missed, but let's just hope we don't play Cardiff during January.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Replacing Omar Richards

In the summer team report I wrote: "we  really  don't want to be going into 2021/2022 without any LBs so a new contract for Omar has to be on the agenda early". And yet, that seems to be exactly what's happening with Richards set to depart for pastures new. Whether he goes to Bayern Munich or not, bigger clubs are circling. There's a couple of options internally, and the club are also looking elsewhere. Ethan Bristow The youngster has been the go-to left-back for cup matches and tends to start for the U23s. He's been brought onto the bench since Richards' injury, but has found himself behind Gibson and McIntyre in the pecking order. Bristow's little run inside drags the right-back narrow, and gives Aluko space to attack He has good vision to spot a pass, and often plays them first time to not allow the defence to put him under pressure. That's normally followed by an intelligent run, and not always to get the ball - sometimes he simply pulls a defe

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

Bournemouth 4-2 Reading

Reading slipped out of the promotion places for the first time this season after a fourth defeat. It looked like the international break had worked for the away side, after they lead by two goals at the break, only to concede four after half time. Semedo plays both a poor pass, and the wrong pass. Should drive, or pass to Aluko in space rather than trying a very difficult through ball. Before the game, I was critical of Alfa Semedo's continued inclusion, but it was his long legs nipping in before Begovic that won Reading their penalty. Despite that he just didn't offer enough in the rest of the match, costing his team going both ways. In the first half he had a great opportunity with a header - admittedly a chance he helped to create - but he got it completely wrong. As a defensive midfielder, heading should be well within his wheelhouse. Then there was the first time ball to try to put Ejaria through that went completely wrong, rather than easier pass to the completely unmarke