Skip to main content

Adam Le Fondre: The Right Move?

Adam Le Fondre notching 39 goals in 104 league appearances doesn't tell the whole story of a player who's scored more goals from then bench than any other player in a Premier League season. So often left out of the starting XI, but still finished the club's top scorer in all of his three seasons here.

ALF seems to have always been disenchanted with his role at the club, seeing himself as more than a 'super sub', and the statistics would somewhat agree with him. Of the 27 games he started this season we won 13, or 48%. When not in the team that figure drops to 6 from 21, or 29%. Admittedly he was on the bench for the tough December run, and in matches away at Burnley, and Wigan, which may slightly skew this in his favour.

For a team who were 16th in terms of goals from open play, and 20th in shots per game a clinical goalscorer is key. Le Fondre had the second best conversion rate, behind Hernandez, in the Premier League last season scoring on 22% of his shots. Unfortunately for Le Fondre he's only been able to muster 1.4 shots per game in the Championship. Some quick maths tells us that means he's had around 53 shots this year, which equates to a 28% conversion rate. Of course, if you take away his 6 goals in two games then you're left with 9 goals over the rest of the season, and penalties dwindle that number further - although unlike Billy Sharp he did tend to convert.

A key criticism of ALF is that he doesn't contribute enough to the team when he's not scoring, and of all our offensive options he's the one who had created the least number of chances. After his back-to-back home hat-tricks he went thirteen games without scoring, and during this time he often looked anonymous. Partly down to the football we were playing, but if we are going to play this style of football then it suits somebody with presence, HRK and Pog, far more than it does ALF. On the other hand, if we don't have a finisher on the pitch, where are the goals going to come from? Pog got a handful, but his conversion rate of around 18% is far less clinical than Le Fondre.

Obviously the fans love him, for what he's done for the club, and a sale like this has the potential to disillusion a lot of people. Thankfully, if it does go through - and it sounds like it has - then we have the whole summer to replace him, hopefully with the funds becoming available from the takeover. I just wonder whether, for the reported £1m, it's sensible to let such a player go. I'd much rather have sold McCarthy, where we have good, proven back-up in Federici but obviously nobody knows whether that was even an option with the pressing HMRC deadline.

To many people his attitude towards the club means that he won't be particularly missed, but let's just hope we don't play Cardiff during January.


Popular posts from this blog

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

The Big Man Cometh

In the grand scheme of things, I consider myself a bit of an Andy Carroll sceptic. Reading have a penchant for signing players that spend the majority of their time in the physio room, and Carroll aligns with that transfer policy to a tee. It must be said that given the lack of other options, and a short term deal that has no real risk for the club, there isn't any big downside in gambling on the Geordie. With that being said, even I was calling out for the introduction for The Big Man at half-time on Saturday. Reading had a heap of possession just outside the box in the opening forty-five but couldn't translate that into chances. Drinkwater had a tame shot saved after good work from Yiadom, but the best chance of the half fell to Puscas after a fortuitous deflection off a Forest player. The flag went up for offside but it didn't matter as the striker couldn't convert anyway. Both managers had done a fairly good job at negating the other side's strengths. Forest'

"We’ve never been so flat"

There have been some abysmal Reading performances this season, I don't really need to list them out. But in that dirge, there are two performances that I haven't fully come to terms with my feelings on. The visits of Sheffield United and Luton to The SCL are a clash between feeling like the concept behind the tactics was  reasonable and the implementation clearly not working. But there's one issue with my reading of the game; Veljko himself wasn't happy with either performance. In fact, he used the exact same word to label both - 'flat'. Reading's three in midfield meant they could cover SU attacking midfielders and wing backs And yet, the set-ups for both seem to perfectly explain why the team may be flat. Against The Blades they switched to a 4-3-2-1, with Ejaria dropping deeper to form the three alongside Drinkwater and Laurent. That trio were effectively tasked with stopping McGoldrick and Gibbs-White from being able to come central. On Wednesday we may