Skip to main content

Reading 0-0 Huddersfield Town

Back down to Earth with a bump. It's one thing to draw a match, it's another to feel like you don't necessarily deserve to. Thankfully, Huddersfield didn't really do enough to win so I guess it evens itself out.

Blackett wants to make the blue run, expects Obita to cut inside. Obita runs wide and Blackett takes himself out of play by running into the same space

Obviously, Bowen made a curious team selection - which is amazing when only changing one player. Playing Jordan Obita completely changes the dynamic of the left-hand side. He hugs wide to the touchline and looks to cross. Of the five he attempted, he completed just one. Meite may be a good aerial threat on the right, against smaller full-backs, but centre backs tend to have a couple of inches on him. Ejaria, meanwhile, came inside and allowed Blackett to give the width. There were a few times when Blackett just didn't know whether to make the outside or inside run and ended up doing nothing.

So, if Obita was the wrong choice who was the correct one? Well, potentially Michael Olise. Although he does seem more comfortable coming inside onto his stronger foot from the right. So maybe starting Lucas Boyé wouldn't have been such a bad idea. I'm still firmly in the 'don't sign him permanently' camp, but given we have nothing to play for, why not give the Argentine a run-out? He's had a tough time here and probably deserves a little reward.

Pelé rolls the ball into Puscas. The forward holds off two challenges but has no real support and ends up going backwards. Pelé could have offered for the ball back down the line.

And when the left side doesn't fire it's difficult to direct too much criticism at Meite or Puscas. This is a problem that goes back to Millwall in January. On that day at The Den Millwall stopped us playing down the left, and the game plan disintegrated. Midweek it was our team selection that achieved the same result. And, in fact, neither were that bad. I thought Puscas played pretty well, but it's not his fault he's got no support. Think he was unlucky to get subbed rather than a straight Meite/Olise swap, but heaven forbid we play without Yakou.

I've done this to death by now so won't bore you any more with it other than this is a manager who keeps harping on about how high up we're attempting to finish in the table, but we're playing 4-1-4-1 (and a true 4-1-4-1, with two flat banks of four) at home to Huddersfield with less than 40% possession. I cannot imagine that when fans do come back they'll be too happy with that sort of football.

Highlighting the good - Pelé commits Mounié and ESR before shifting the ball to Morrison.


Pelé, who had been singled out for praise on BBCRB, wasn't actually that good. He was dribbled past four times, more than any other game this season. Part of that is because Emile Smith Rowe is really good, and that's completely understandable, but he's on the pitch to negate the player between the lines and he didn't do that. On the whole, he was better in possession. He has a tendency to take one touch and then either attempt a pass or drive into space. He's good at committing a player and then shifting the ball; the problem is that too often his more progressive balls on the counter tend to fail and put pressure straight back on the team.

Blackett tries to get to the ball before Lossl. Admittedly Blackett doesn't feel like the usual target, so maybe this was meant back post? Maybe we were trying to find Meite at the front post? I have no idea. Willock left Pelé late, but look how much space he's in. A lot. A lot of space.

The corner routine was interesting (or, I guess you could say, bad). Reading had four. We ran slightly different routines each time, but the ball in was the same - each giving Lossl catching practice. I think the third (not pictured because that would be too easy) gave the best idea of what Reading were trying to do - stealing in front of Lossl before he could get there, but all were overhit and I may be being generous with my interpretation. Huddersfield did pretty well at allowing the keeper to come to meet the ball by holding off Reading players, and they set up decent counters too. So for the fourth Reading mixed it up, by working a horrendous short corner routine that led to John Swift under hitting a backpass and almost allowing Huddersfield in to score. So maybe just stick with plan A.

Personally, and I know this will be coming across, I hate this football. It is depressing, defensive play. It's not even particularly effective. Let's put this in perspective - Huddersfield played Luton after this match and lost 2-0. We had two shots on target in ninety minutes - and one of those was a speculative hit with the last kick of the game. We'll probably hammer Charlton now, but as we've already seen, that doesn't really mean much.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bowen's Brand New Box

The first game of pre-season is done, and wasn't it an interesting one? Mark Bowen previewed a brand new 3-6-1, with more central midfielders than anybody could have dreamt of. As theorized we played a back-three and wing-backs. The midfield, however, had that unexpected additional body, meaning that Joao played as a lone striker.Consistency is a much sought after commodity in football, so I suppose it can be classed as a positive that there's only a single new recruit in the squad. Laurent's role as one of the deeper midfielders was slightly surprising, because everything from his stint at Shrewsbury implied that he's a similar, but more offensive player than Rinomhota. Swift takes the majority of the ball, so he's not expected to be the main playmaker, but he was comfortable in possession and picks the right pass when needed. Plus his pressing, and positional play were encouraging.Morrison played in the centre of defensive trio. When he was in possession McIntyre…

Reading 0-3 Wigan

Where do you start after an absolute drubbing?

Probably at the root problem, and that was Mark Bowen's tactics. Now, I have no particular issues with 4-4-2 as a system, but I think it's a horrible formation for our collection of players. The 4-1-4-1 works because the two unconvential wide men push up and in toward the striker to form an offensive three (in some way). In a 4-4-2 they have to act as more legitimate wingers, because the two up front are operating in the advanced space. So the decision to play Ejaria - not a particularly quick or direct player - on one wing, with Araruna - someone who has never been in position - is just terrible decision making. It, yet again, screams of Bowen's basic decision process. More attacking = no DM, more strikers.

Please don't get me started on the comment that everyone should know how to play it. You still have to pick the right players.


Not only that, but Wigan were able to play through the lines too easily. With Morsy, Willia…

A Potted History of Veljko Paunović

Veljko Paunović is Reading manager. The Serbian is a relative unknown here, but after leading his home nation to the U20 World Cup he put his name on the proverbial map. That lead to taking over at MLS side Chicago Fire in 2015, where he stayed for four years before being fired with one of the worst ever MLS records. For the past year, he's been unemployed.Serbia's victory at the U20 World Cup in New Zealand was a surprise. 2015 remains the only tournament that Serbia has qualified for since the dissolution of Yugoslavia. The tournament opened with a loss to Uruguay, a game in which they played a 3-6-1. For the subsequent group games they switched to a 4-2-3-1 or alternated to a 4-1-4-1; both Mali and Mexico were dispatched 2-0.They kept the same set-up for the knock-out phase, but were never as convincing, needing extra time in every round. An injury-time equaliser against Hungary combined with an own goal in the round of 16, penalties were required to see off The USA in the …