Skip to main content

Reading 0-0 Burnley

Reading fans have now gone two games without seeing a goal after this weekend's game against Burnley ended in a second consecutive goalless draw. At least this time there was some excitement.

Andre Gray's Shots
In truth Burnley should have been out sight, but Andre Gray had an absolutely shocking game. In the third minute the division top scorer nipped in front of Cooper, but skied it from six yards. Around the hour mark he tumbled (read: dived) over the leg of Al-Habsi to win a penalty. After a fair bit of a kerfuffle, in which Reading showed passion that's been lacking for much of the season, Gray's shot was well saved. Potentially Hal scuffing up the penalty spot wasn't the greatest show of sportsmanship ever, and Al-Habsi may have been off his line before the ball was struck but all of that is consigned to irrelevance. Seconds later the Burnley striker somehow knocked the ball wide from the centre of the goal, five yards out. It is somewhat telling that the only change Sean Dyche made was to replace the former Brentford man.

Reading obviously had their own chances; the best saw Piazon nod over from six yards. A glorious Norwood cross picked out the Chelsea loanee completely unmarked, but he didn't convert. In fact that was pretty much the only thing of note Piazon did all game. 0 chances created, 0 crosses, 0 take-ons, 0 tackles, 1 interception, and that header. Like Gray, not a surprise he was substituted.

Hal Robson-Kanu had a solid first forty-five, but dropped off in the second period. His cross early in the game saw Kermorgant hit the post. He does seem to be finding some form, although he failed with all three of his attempted take-ons, with Stephen Ward managing to dispossess him every time. Maybe he should stick to passing back to Gunter (or maybe not, more on that in a sec). Meanwhile Norwood continues to be a shining light; despite a relatively poor game, his four key passes was the most of anyone on the pitch.

Hector again showed why defensive midfield should be considered his primary position, not really putting a foot wrong. The only minor issue being he seemed to give his overconfidence to Cooper who played himself into trouble a little and, as mentioned, let Gray in front of him for a chance that should have seen us go one nil down. McShane alongside him bailed him out a couple of times too with his experience. Obviously he's still young, and he should cut those mistakes out of his game as he grows - thankfully they didn't cost us this time.

Gunter and Obita's Crossing
The real cause for concern comes at full back on both sides of the pitch. Four crosses in total with none of them finding a Reading shirt is atrocious. It's not new, but it's frustrating. Obita always feels like he's phoning it in, and while Gunter works hard his crossing is poor. When compared to Matthew Lowton it looks even worse. The Burnley right-back attempted five crosses, and found his target with two. An infinitely better return than Reading's duo. It's not just crossing, comparing them to their opposite numbers on Saturday the stats read:

Tackles : 43% - 83%
Aerial Duels : 33% - 75%
Chances Created : 0 - 2

The only place Gunter and Obita come out on top is passing percentage, and that's only because Burnley play a much more direct style, as can be seen below. Historically Reading's full backs have overlapped their wingers, put in dangerous crosses, and run their socks off. Hypothetically that's doable within the seemingly preferred 4-2-3-1 we play. This would allow the AML/AMR to play slightly narrower in a role I believe Football Manager would call the 'Inside Forward'. That means that Kermorgant would be less isolated, and would have three options for knockdowns/flick-ons than the one he currently has. The only downside is it requires a much more disciplined DM to fill in when one goes forward, which doesn't tend to be the case when Norwood and Williams play together. It would shackle two players who require much freer roles. However playing with Hector or Tish is perfect. They sit further back, and play much more as the anchor man. So in this particular game I'd expect far more touches in around the opposition box, but Obita didn't make a pass in the final third. Football requires risk. I don't think it's particularly surprising we can't open up defenses when our full backs seem so scared to lose the ball.

Full backs' passing for both teams

Either way a draw against third in the table is nothing to be sniffed at - especially when it means we've taken four points from them this season. It may have taken an ill-tempered game with some of the poorest refereeing I've seen in a long time (appealing should not equal a foul, and how many fouls does it take Barton to get booked?) but there was some actual passion on show for what felt like the first time in a long time. Now just to find some shooting boots and maybe we can coast our way to the play-offs on the back of a succession of 1-0 victories. After we get through to the fifth round of the FA Cup this weekend, of course.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

The Big Man Cometh

In the grand scheme of things, I consider myself a bit of an Andy Carroll sceptic. Reading have a penchant for signing players that spend the majority of their time in the physio room, and Carroll aligns with that transfer policy to a tee. It must be said that given the lack of other options, and a short term deal that has no real risk for the club, there isn't any big downside in gambling on the Geordie. With that being said, even I was calling out for the introduction for The Big Man at half-time on Saturday. Reading had a heap of possession just outside the box in the opening forty-five but couldn't translate that into chances. Drinkwater had a tame shot saved after good work from Yiadom, but the best chance of the half fell to Puscas after a fortuitous deflection off a Forest player. The flag went up for offside but it didn't matter as the striker couldn't convert anyway. Both managers had done a fairly good job at negating the other side's strengths. Forest'

"We’ve never been so flat"

There have been some abysmal Reading performances this season, I don't really need to list them out. But in that dirge, there are two performances that I haven't fully come to terms with my feelings on. The visits of Sheffield United and Luton to The SCL are a clash between feeling like the concept behind the tactics was  reasonable and the implementation clearly not working. But there's one issue with my reading of the game; Veljko himself wasn't happy with either performance. In fact, he used the exact same word to label both - 'flat'. Reading's three in midfield meant they could cover SU attacking midfielders and wing backs And yet, the set-ups for both seem to perfectly explain why the team may be flat. Against The Blades they switched to a 4-3-2-1, with Ejaria dropping deeper to form the three alongside Drinkwater and Laurent. That trio were effectively tasked with stopping McGoldrick and Gibbs-White from being able to come central. On Wednesday we may