Skip to main content

4-4-2 or No?

A busy transfer window for Reading saw huge change at the usually consistent club. Stalwarts Pearce, Federici, and Karacan all left, with almost a dozen new faces coming in. Hector's surprise move to Chelsea on deadline day sealed what had been a frantic few months.

So the next question, ahead of tonight's game against Ipswich, is, 'what's the best way to line up our new squad'?

The obvious answer to that would be the good, old-fashioned 4-4-2. Sá has shown himself to hold up the ball excellently, and can bring new(er) boy Vydra into the attack. We've already seen the former's heading of the ball to be a threat, while the latter is ferocious in the box with his feet. Combined with the creativity of McCleary and Hurtado down both wings, there's sure to be goals.

Williams can continue his role as the aggressor, picked over Quinn for his dribbling from deep, and shooting from distance. They're similar players, but Williams' ability to pick the team up with a driving run is a crucial part of Reading's game plan. Norwood, so far, has managed to find form, and his defensive contribution is off the charts compared to that of his midfield team mates. Obviously his impressive passing can only be a bonus while playing in the deeper role, and will hopefully be able to set up attacks; irrelevant of the situation.

The back four effectively picks itself, with some question marks over whether Ferdinand or Hector should partner McShane at the back. Personally, Ferdinand's experience and calm head wins out over the occasionally rash Hector. We've been solid at the back so far this season, and Hector's mix up with Al-Habsi at Portsmouth only adds to the questions over whether his selection would be the correct one. He also seems to lose his head slightly after making a mistake, and often attempts to force the game where he has no right doing so. I would not be surprised, however, if the loan agreement requires him to play, and in that case Ferdinand will find himself back on the bench, harshly. Bond, although not convincing, is still first choice in my mind, especially with such a good defence protecting him.

Obviously the line-up leaves out Blackman, who has been involved in 3 of our 5 goals so far this season, but overall it's a risk worth taking. Vydra only played the full game eleven times last season, so no doubt Nick would still get a look in.

It wouldn't be hard to play the more modern 4-2-3-1 with the same line-up, with Vydra dropping back in to a AMC role, or possibly Álex Fernández coming in to the starting XI.

Reading - Football tactics and formations

I also think there's a possibility of playing a 3-5-2, although whether the comparisons to Swindon would be worth it is another issue entirely. While McShane and Ferdinand have been solid at the back, and I have no doubt that Hector would be solid with such cover beside him, it does leave us more open at the back. Obita and Gunter have played well, and provide a much needed injection of pace. McCleary and Hurtado would also need to track back more in order to cover the wings, and that's a big ask for two players who haven't been fully fit although the energy of both Quinn and Williams would be a bonus. It's definitely a 'we'll score more than you' formation, and that's exciting but not necessarily intelligent.

Reading - Football tactics and formations

On the tenth anniversary of our ascension to the top division, and a smashing of the points record, with the same formation, surely 4-4-2 is the way to go?


Popular posts from this blog

Reading 0-3 Wigan

Where do you start after an absolute drubbing?

Probably at the root problem, and that was Mark Bowen's tactics. Now, I have no particular issues with 4-4-2 as a system, but I think it's a horrible formation for our collection of players. The 4-1-4-1 works because the two unconvential wide men push up and in toward the striker to form an offensive three (in some way). In a 4-4-2 they have to act as more legitimate wingers, because the two up front are operating in the advanced space. So the decision to play Ejaria - not a particularly quick or direct player - on one wing, with Araruna - someone who has never been in position - is just terrible decision making. It, yet again, screams of Bowen's basic decision process. More attacking = no DM, more strikers.

Please don't get me started on the comment that everyone should know how to play it. You still have to pick the right players.

Not only that, but Wigan were able to play through the lines too easily. With Morsy, Willia…

Bowen's Brand New Box

The first game of pre-season is done, and wasn't it an interesting one? Mark Bowen previewed a brand new 3-6-1, with more central midfielders than anybody could have dreamt of. As theorized we played a back-three and wing-backs. The midfield, however, had that unexpected additional body, meaning that Joao played as a lone striker.Consistency is a much sought after commodity in football, so I suppose it can be classed as a positive that there's only a single new recruit in the squad. Laurent's role as one of the deeper midfielders was slightly surprising, because everything from his stint at Shrewsbury implied that he's a similar, but more offensive player than Rinomhota. Swift takes the majority of the ball, so he's not expected to be the main playmaker, but he was comfortable in possession and picks the right pass when needed. Plus his pressing, and positional play were encouraging.Morrison played in the centre of defensive trio. When he was in possession McIntyre…

A Potted History of Veljko Paunović

Veljko Paunović is Reading manager. The Serbian is a relative unknown here, but after leading his home nation to the U20 World Cup he put his name on the proverbial map. That lead to taking over at MLS side Chicago Fire in 2015, where he stayed for four years before being fired with one of the worst ever MLS records. For the past year, he's been unemployed.Serbia's victory at the U20 World Cup in New Zealand was a surprise. 2015 remains the only tournament that Serbia has qualified for since the dissolution of Yugoslavia. The tournament opened with a loss to Uruguay, a game in which they played a 3-6-1. For the subsequent group games they switched to a 4-2-3-1 or alternated to a 4-1-4-1; both Mali and Mexico were dispatched 2-0.They kept the same set-up for the knock-out phase, but were never as convincing, needing extra time in every round. An injury-time equaliser against Hungary combined with an own goal in the round of 16, penalties were required to see off The USA in the …