Skip to main content

Bradford 0-0 Reading

The FA Cup Quarter Finals generally mean heartbreak for Reading fans, and that could still be the case after the side battled in a hard fought 0-0 draw at a sold out Valley Parade.

In the first half Reading were the better side, but were obviously under instruction to clear the ball at the first chance they could, which meant that clever build up play was few and far between. Jamie Mackie battled for absolutely everything down the right hand side, while Pog ran and ran, albeit with varying success. As the half progressed Danny Williams came more into the game, with a couple of bursting runs, and two long range efforts which didn't trouble the keeper. The only real chance of note was from the right; Mackie managed to get in behind the defender and pulled it back to Pogrebnyak, but his shot ricocheted against the post and harmlessly away. 

Pearce and Hector looked solid at the back, and were rarely troubled in the first 45. The Royals maintained a pretty rigid back four, with Kelly and Obita only occasionally supporting the play, and almost never overlapping and getting in behind - hence the selection of Kelly over Gunter, perhaps. A lot of that will have had to do with the pitch; in the build up it was touted as a big factor, and it performed just as expected - which is to say, appallingly. Reading had obviously learnt from Adam Johnson in the last round, and didn't take any chances at the back, whereas further up the pitch it was bouncing off players and very rarely did Pog manage to take it under control and lay it off to Chalobah or Norwood. When he did it was often this next pass that broke play down.

Although the first half may have belonged to the Southeners it's clear why Bradford have managed to pick off so many. At the end of the first period they were inches away from scoring themselves, a cross-come-shot not getting a touch from anyone and eventually hitting the post, and then, within the first minute of the second half, they almost opened the scoring again, the ball found an unmarked Bradford player at the back post but he scuffed his shot. From there the game solely belonged to The Bantams.

Possibly the best chance of the afternoon came when Stead flicked a fierce header just over Federici's bar, but in truth the Australian actually had few saves to make - just like his opposite number. Neither Yakubu, nor McCleary's introduction ever really threatened to change that fact, although Reading had the last good chance when Norwood's free kick found a gaggle of bodies threatening the far post, but nobody could scramble the ball home.

My only real complaint is the officials. The ref gave nothing all afternoon in regards to climbing, or leading with the arm. It got ridiculous at one stage, and his linesman on our near side didn't help at all. The occasion clearly got to him as he was clearly seeing something different to the rest of the ground. He had to be overruled by the referee twice for obvious throw ins. There was also a quite bizarre period of play that was brought back for a foul throw what felt like a minute before hand. Equally only four additional minutes after six subs and a lengthy stoppage for Chalobah was baffling.

All-in-all I think the team will take the result. The second half they never really looked to attack, and were clearly weary of an in-form side. On the Madejski pitch, where they can actually play out from the back and build attacks, I'm more confident of our chances, but Chelsea's pitch is immeasurably better than ours and look what happened to them. Whether the team can bare to play yet another game is an interesting dilemma, and at some point the League may have to take precedence. Bradford will probably be disappointed at not being able to take their chances but the game really was split down half time, and a draw is fairly respective of the ninety minutes. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scout Report: Brentford

It almost feels superfluous to write about a Brentford team who have already been covered so extensively. Famed for their player recruitment the core of their side is a young, attack-minded group of players who seemingly love to play together. They tend to play 4-3-3, with Watkins as the main striker, and Benrahma and Mbeumo attempting to find space to either side of him. The midfield three is given stability by Christian Norgaard in the holding role, while Dasilva and Jensen are free to push on. Even goalkeeper David Raya Martin is crucial to the team's attacking intent. His quick distribution reminiscent of Marcus Hahnemann bowling out to Bobby Convey to set the winger away. That said defensively the Spaniard can occasionally be caught out, infamously allowing Ryan Tafazolli to pass the ball from the halfway line into the Brentford net. That's not the only mistake he's made this year - a missed punch condemned Brentford to a loss at Kenilworth Road, and similarly lead to

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

If Anything, Reading's Win In Wales Is Just More Of The Same

Paunovic has been under increasing pressure in recent weeks. Last Tuesday he received criticism from all quarters after a dire midweek defeat to Sheffield United, where he changed the shape of the team to nullify the opposition threat. Although there were some interesting takes by those who didn't seem to fully appreciate the formation, it was clear that it wasn't just the opposition's attacking threat that the manager put the mockers on. And yet, one win seems to redeem all. My personal view on The Gaffer is that, given the injuries in the squad, he's doing as well as could reasonably be expected. Obviously he's made errors, but he's also been handicapped by off field matters. The six-point deduction has made the gap to relegation closer than it ought to be, but the team are clearly good enough to comfortably pull clear over the course of the season and, indeed, have been achieving if Reading had started on minus 6.  So my issue isn't with him, but with th