Skip to main content

Is Samrit Bunditkitsada Too Good To Be True?

Samrit Bunditkitsada's progressing takeover of Reading has caused a great stir on social media sites, with the man himself happy to accept Facebook requests on his 'personal' page. With all the hype around him many have been trying to temper expectations, with the memory of Anton still fresh. That said, the 39-year-old has won over many fans already. In many ways he's the antithesis of the current regime with his open communication, compared to that of Zingarevich era when the club were conspicuously silent - even in the face of ever growing concerns from the fans - which is evidently garnering a positive reaction.

The biggest issue for many is how much Bunditkitsada's actually worth. A reporter allegedly told BBCRB that he's got no more than £180m, a fair bit less than the 'billionaire' that GetReading seem to suggest - although that's fairly insignificant if he's just the head of a consortium, as the paper have reported (Charles Watts on twitter told me there are definitely other guys with money involved). Plus Samrit's already promised £5-8m for Adkins to improve his squad, and that's a fair amount of investment for a club that hasn't made a permanent transfer in over a year, although only time will tell if it will be enough to seriously challenge for promotion - the inclusion of a collar on this year's kit suggest it may be. Of course there's a worry that the money won't be made available to the manager, but rather be used to fund 'vanity signings' á la Anton, We're still trying to shift RR Drenthe from his tenure, but hopefully if a group of investors are involved they'll be less likely to fund each others whims and more likely to listen to the manager... I can dream, can't I?

Where Anton was rumoured to be funded by his father, which is allegedly why his relationship with the club broke down when Papa Zing. decided - for whatever reason - to pull that funding, there appear to be no such concerns over Samrit's cash flow. However, if he is the head of a consortium, then there's absolutely no guarantee with the rest consortium, but the safety net of multiple investors is another plus for the consortium.

Perhaps the only worry is that SJM, after years of trying to find the 'right' buyer, may have settled for the first buyer who met his valuation. Where fans will be hoping that the Zingarevich saga taught SJM a lesson - even if withdrawing funding with little or no reason is fairly hard to foresee - it's more likely that a quick sale is at the forefront of his mind. With the club in a self-imposed transfer embargo then speed is essential, thankfully we seem to be able to pay everything necessary at the moment - so let's hope this is all wrapped up quickly (as Samrit suggests it will be) and we can get back to wishing for transfers that never materialise, just like days of old.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

The Big Man Cometh

In the grand scheme of things, I consider myself a bit of an Andy Carroll sceptic. Reading have a penchant for signing players that spend the majority of their time in the physio room, and Carroll aligns with that transfer policy to a tee. It must be said that given the lack of other options, and a short term deal that has no real risk for the club, there isn't any big downside in gambling on the Geordie. With that being said, even I was calling out for the introduction for The Big Man at half-time on Saturday. Reading had a heap of possession just outside the box in the opening forty-five but couldn't translate that into chances. Drinkwater had a tame shot saved after good work from Yiadom, but the best chance of the half fell to Puscas after a fortuitous deflection off a Forest player. The flag went up for offside but it didn't matter as the striker couldn't convert anyway. Both managers had done a fairly good job at negating the other side's strengths. Forest'

"We’ve never been so flat"

There have been some abysmal Reading performances this season, I don't really need to list them out. But in that dirge, there are two performances that I haven't fully come to terms with my feelings on. The visits of Sheffield United and Luton to The SCL are a clash between feeling like the concept behind the tactics was  reasonable and the implementation clearly not working. But there's one issue with my reading of the game; Veljko himself wasn't happy with either performance. In fact, he used the exact same word to label both - 'flat'. Reading's three in midfield meant they could cover SU attacking midfielders and wing backs And yet, the set-ups for both seem to perfectly explain why the team may be flat. Against The Blades they switched to a 4-3-2-1, with Ejaria dropping deeper to form the three alongside Drinkwater and Laurent. That trio were effectively tasked with stopping McGoldrick and Gibbs-White from being able to come central. On Wednesday we may