Skip to main content

Adam Le Fondre: The Right Move?

Adam Le Fondre notching 39 goals in 104 league appearances doesn't tell the whole story of a player who's scored more goals from then bench than any other player in a Premier League season. So often left out of the starting XI, but still finished the club's top scorer in all of his three seasons here.

ALF seems to have always been disenchanted with his role at the club, seeing himself as more than a 'super sub', and the statistics would somewhat agree with him. Of the 27 games he started this season we won 13, or 48%. When not in the team that figure drops to 6 from 21, or 29%. Admittedly he was on the bench for the tough December run, and in matches away at Burnley, and Wigan, which may slightly skew this in his favour.

For a team who were 16th in terms of goals from open play, and 20th in shots per game a clinical goalscorer is key. Le Fondre had the second best conversion rate, behind Hernandez, in the Premier League last season scoring on 22% of his shots. Unfortunately for Le Fondre he's only been able to muster 1.4 shots per game in the Championship. Some quick maths tells us that means he's had around 53 shots this year, which equates to a 28% conversion rate. Of course, if you take away his 6 goals in two games then you're left with 9 goals over the rest of the season, and penalties dwindle that number further - although unlike Billy Sharp he did tend to convert.

A key criticism of ALF is that he doesn't contribute enough to the team when he's not scoring, and of all our offensive options he's the one who had created the least number of chances. After his back-to-back home hat-tricks he went thirteen games without scoring, and during this time he often looked anonymous. Partly down to the football we were playing, but if we are going to play this style of football then it suits somebody with presence, HRK and Pog, far more than it does ALF. On the other hand, if we don't have a finisher on the pitch, where are the goals going to come from? Pog got a handful, but his conversion rate of around 18% is far less clinical than Le Fondre.

Obviously the fans love him, for what he's done for the club, and a sale like this has the potential to disillusion a lot of people. Thankfully, if it does go through - and it sounds like it has - then we have the whole summer to replace him, hopefully with the funds becoming available from the takeover. I just wonder whether, for the reported £1m, it's sensible to let such a player go. I'd much rather have sold McCarthy, where we have good, proven back-up in Federici but obviously nobody knows whether that was even an option with the pressing HMRC deadline.

To many people his attitude towards the club means that he won't be particularly missed, but let's just hope we don't play Cardiff during January.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Scout Report: Brentford

It almost feels superfluous to write about a Brentford team who have already been covered so extensively. Famed for their player recruitment the core of their side is a young, attack-minded group of players who seemingly love to play together. They tend to play 4-3-3, with Watkins as the main striker, and Benrahma and Mbeumo attempting to find space to either side of him. The midfield three is given stability by Christian Norgaard in the holding role, while Dasilva and Jensen are free to push on. Even goalkeeper David Raya Martin is crucial to the team's attacking intent. His quick distribution reminiscent of Marcus Hahnemann bowling out to Bobby Convey to set the winger away. That said defensively the Spaniard can occasionally be caught out, infamously allowing Ryan Tafazolli to pass the ball from the halfway line into the Brentford net. That's not the only mistake he's made this year - a missed punch condemned Brentford to a loss at Kenilworth Road, and similarly lead to

Reading FC Season Review | 2020/2021

When your season starts with your manager having to watch your opening match from the hotel because he's not been hired in time to beat the quarantine, anything above getting relegated should probably be classed as a success. And Reading exceeded surely even the most optimistic of pre-season predictions. Veljko Paunovic Veljko Paunovic almost exclusively utilised a core group of players in a 4-2-3-1, only changing things when enforced. One of the consequences of that is that Reading had more players play over 3,000 minutes than any other side (roughly three-quarters of the season). That consistency is often seen as a good thing, but in a condensed season, it surely contributed to the injury woes. It can't have helped that the manager also used the second-fewest number of players over the course of the season. His substitutions were often categorised as late (Reading's subs played just 16 minutes on average, only Norwich's played fewer) or non-existent (Reading were 19t

If Anything, Reading's Win In Wales Is Just More Of The Same

Paunovic has been under increasing pressure in recent weeks. Last Tuesday he received criticism from all quarters after a dire midweek defeat to Sheffield United, where he changed the shape of the team to nullify the opposition threat. Although there were some interesting takes by those who didn't seem to fully appreciate the formation, it was clear that it wasn't just the opposition's attacking threat that the manager put the mockers on. And yet, one win seems to redeem all. My personal view on The Gaffer is that, given the injuries in the squad, he's doing as well as could reasonably be expected. Obviously he's made errors, but he's also been handicapped by off field matters. The six-point deduction has made the gap to relegation closer than it ought to be, but the team are clearly good enough to comfortably pull clear over the course of the season and, indeed, have been achieving if Reading had started on minus 6.  So my issue isn't with him, but with th